| Sr. No. | Name of the Applicant | States/UT | Brief of Order in Appeal (OIA) | Order No. & Date | Download | Category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 331 | Cliantha Research Limited | Maharashtra | The Applicant would like to seek a ruling on whether the "Clinical Research" services proposed to be provided by them to entities located outside India is liable to Central Goods and Services Tax and State Goods and Services Tax or Integrated Goods and Services Tax or is it eligible to be treated as an export of service under Section 2(6) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017? |
GST-ARA- 119/2018-19/B- 50 Mumbai dated 04.05.2019 | 97(2)(e) | |
| 332 | Rotary Club Of Mumbai Queens Necklace | Maharashtra | 1. The questions/ issues before Your Honor for determination is whether the amount collected as membership subscription and admission fees from members is liable to GST as supply of services? 2. If the above receipts are liable to GST can the Club claim Input tax credit of the tax paid on Banquet and catering services for holding members meetings and various events? |
GST-ARA- 118/2018-19/B- 46 Mumbai dated 30.04.2019 | 97(2)(a) (e)(f)(g) | |
| 333 | Bilcare Limited | Maharashtra | 1. Determining whether the various services provided to foreign clients i.e. situated outside India and for which the place of supply is in the taxable territory shall be liable to Integrated Tax (herein referred to as "IGST") or Central Goods and Service Tax (herein referred to as "CGST") and State Goods and Service Tax (herein referred to as "SGST") for the purpose of levy of Goods and Services Tax (GST) under the GST Law. 2. In case it is ruled that IGST is payable, the procedure to be followed for payment of IGST as the GST portal does not permit the payment of IGST where the place of supply is indicated as state of Maharashtra. |
GST-ARA- 117/2018-19/B- 45 Mumbai dated 26.04.2019 | 97(2) (e) | |
| 334 | The Leprosy Mission Trust Of India | Maharashtra | 1 :- Whether services provided under vocational training courses recognized by National Council for Vocational Training (NCVT) or Jan ShikshanSansthan (JSS) is exempt either under Entry No 64 of exemption list of Goods and Service Tax Act 2017 or under Educational Institution defined under Notification 22/Central Tax (Rate)? 2 :- Whether services provided under vocational training courses provided by the applicant are exempt under Entry No 66 of the Notification 22/2017 - Central Tax (Rate)? |
GST-ARA- 116/2018-19/B- 44 Mumbai dated 26.04.2019 | 97(2)(b) (g) | |
| 335 | Sanofi India Limited | Maharashtra | 1. Whether input tax credit is available of the GST paid on expenses incurred towards promotional schemes of ShubhLabh Loyalty Program? 2. Whether input tax credit is available of the GST paid on expenses incurred towards promotional schemes goods given as brand reminders? |
GST-ARA- 115/2018-19/B- 43 Mumbai dated 24.04.2019 | 97(2)(d) | |
| 336 | Aarel Import Export Private Limited | Maharashtra | 1. Whether the procedure to raise the invoice from Mumbai Office for imports received at Paradip Port, Odisha where we do not have any separate GST Registration and Charge IGST from Mumbai to our Customers is correct? or do we have to take separate Registration in the State of Odisha for the below mentioned transactions? 2. If we do not need separate registration in Odisha, can we do the transaction on Mumbai Office GSTIN, then in case of issuance of e-way bill is it correct to Mention the GSTIN of Mumbai and Dispatch place as Paradip Port? |
GST-ARA- 114/2018-19/B- 42 Mumbai dated 24.04.2019 | 97(2) (f) | |
| 337 | Daewoo-TPL JV | Maharashtra | 1): The Applicant though eligible to claim for refund of inverted duty structure under Section 54(3) of the CGST Act, wishes to understand in-principle applicability of Notification No 21 and 26 in as much whether the same allow for refund of ITC availed on input services (and remaining unutilized) in whole or part thereof. 2) :Where the answer to above is negative, the Applicant wishes to understand how does the Notification 21 and 26 apply in a scenario where factually following financials may exist: |
GST-ARA- 113/2018-19/B- 41 Mumbai dated 24.04.2019 | 97(2)(a) & (b) | |
| 338 | Gandhar Oil Refinery (India) Limited | Maharashtra | 1:- Whether the applicant requires registration in each State separately? 2 :- Whether the applicant can adopt the procedure to raise the invoice from Mumbai Head Office/Registered Office at Mumbai for imports received at various ports, located in various states in India and charge IGST from Mumbai to our customers in various state is proper or not. 3 :- If we cancel separate registration in various state can we do the transaction on Mumbai Head Office GSTN, then in case of issuance of E - way bill is it correct to mention the GSTN of Mumbai and mention dispatch place of port of respective state/port |
GST-ARA-112 /2018-19/B- 40 Mumbai dated 15.04.2019 | 97(2)(f) | |
| 339 | City And Industrial Development Corporation Of Maharashtra Limited | Maharashtra | 1) Whether the supply of services by the applicant, of ‘transfer by way of lease’ of vacant plots of ‘Maharashtra State Government owned lands’ or ‘privately owned lands acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 by the Maharashtra State Government’ vested in CIDCO, to: (a) Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation(‘NMMC’), for intended development thereof and construction of buildings by the latter on each of those plots, demarcated for separate use as: (b) Panvel Municipal Corporation(‘PMC’), for intended development thereof and construction of buildings by the latter on each of those plots, demarcated for separate use as: |
GST-ARA- 111/2018-19/B- 39 Mumbai dated 13.04.2019 | 97(2)(a)& (e) | |
| 340 | Jalaram Feeds | Maharashtra | Whether the firm is liable to take registration under sec 24 or is exempted from registration under sec 23? |
GST-ARA- 110/2018-19/B- 38 Mumbai dated 10.04.2019 | 97(2)(f) |





