| Sr. No. | Name of the Applicant | States/UT | Brief of Order in Appeal (OIA) | Order No. & Date | Download | Category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 381 | Cummins India Limited | Maharashtra | 2.Whether availment of input tax credit of tax on common input supplies on behalf of other unit/units registered as distinct person and further allocation of the cost incurred for same to such other units qualifies as supply and attracts levy of GST? 3. If GST is leviable, whether assessable value can be determined by arriving at nominal value? 4. Once GST is levied and ITC thereof is availed by recipient unit, whether the Applicant is required to register itself as an Input Service Distributor for distribution of ITC on common input supplies? |
NO.GST-ARA-66 /2018-19/B- 162 Mumbai dated 19.12.2018 | 97(2) (i) (v) | |
| 382 | Cummins India Limited | Maharashtra | Determination of GST liability by deciding principal supply of the composite supply qua maintenance contracts executed between the customer and the Applicant. |
NO.GST-ARA- 65/2018-19/B- 161 Mumbai dated 19.12.2018 | 97(2) (i) (v) | |
| 383 | NES GLOBAL SPECIALIST ENGINEERING SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED | Maharashtra | Question :- Whether the transaction in question is a Zero Rated Supply or a Normal Supply under the GST ACT? Question :- If the said supply is a Zero Rated Supply, then can the same be considered as an export of service under the GST Act? |
NO.GST-ARA- 52/2018-19/B- 160 Mumbai dated 19.12.2018 | 97(2) (v) | |
| 384 | ALLIED BLENDERS AND DISTILLERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Maharashtra | Whether in the facts and circumstances of the present case, the Contract Bottling Unit is making a taxable supply to the Applicant (i.e. Brand Owner), or, alternatively, whether the Applicant (i.e. brand owner) is making a taxable supply to the Contract Bottling Unit? Correspondingly, whether in the facts and circumstances of the present case, the Applicant (i.e. Brand Owner) is paying consideration to the Contract Bottling Unit by way of bottling charges, or, alternatively, whether the Contract Bottling Unit is paying consideration to the Applicant by way of brand owner surplus? |
NO.GST-ARA- 67/2018-19/B- 155 Mumbai dated 15.12.2018 | 97(2) (v) | |
| 385 | Cable Corporation of India Limited | Maharashtra | Whether the supply of transportation services, rendered by the Applicant, will be exempt from the levy of GST in terms of Sl. no. 18 of the Notification No. 12/2017 - Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June, 2017. |
GST-ARA- 63/2018-19/B- 134 Mumbai dated 03.11.2018 | 97(2) (i)(ii) (v) | |
| 386 | Sadashiv Anajee Shete | Maharashtra | 1. Whether exemption under Sr. No. 13 of Notification No. 12/2017 - Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June 2017 is applicable to the Applicant? 2. Whether the Applicant is liable to get registered under section 22/24 of CGST Act, 2017? 3. If the Applicant is liable to pay GST, then on what value GST liability needs to be discharged, whether on the commission which the Applicant receives from pundits/website users or on the booking value received from website users? |
NO.GST-ARA- 32/2018-19/B- 131 Mumbai dated 30.10.2018 | 97(2) (ii) (iii) (v) (vi) | |
| 387 | Merck Life Science Private Limited | Maharashtra | I. Whether applicant's direction to the seller (directed in agreement dated 21 June 2018) for direct transfer of BP business to MSPL and PM business to MPMPL, respectively would qualify as a 'supply between the applicant' and 'MSPL/MPMPL'? ii. If the answer to the above question is 'affirmative' then as the parties are related, even in absence of the actual consideration does the applicant have to attribute a notional consideration and charge GST in line with schedule 1 of GST Act to be compliant? iii. If the answer to both the questions are 'affirmative' then as the recipients (MSPL/MPMPL) are eligible to avail full input tax credit then the notional consideration (percentage of the business transfer value) would be only academic and will the invoice value be considered as open market value? |
NO.GST-ARA- 62/2018-19/B- 133 Mumbai dated 30.10.2018 | 97(2) (iii) (v) (vii) | |
| 388 | NATIONAL SECURITY SERVICES | Maharashtra | Whether the Exemption Notification No.12/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated 28/06/2017 (Entry No. 3 of the Notfn.) is applicable to the applicant for the Pure services i.e. Security Services rendered to Pimpri Chinch wad Municipal Corporation in relation to functions entrusted to Municipality under Article 243 W of the Constitution thereby exempting the applicant service provider from the whole of GST. |
NO.GST-ARA- 58/2018-19/B- 132 Mumbai dated 24.10.2018 | 97(2) (ii) (v) | |
| 389 | K Uttamlal Exports Pvt. Ltd. | Maharashtra | 1) Whether the goods exported out of required India directly by the manufacturer mentioning the applicant as Third Party Exporter for the purpose of Foreign Trade Policy will be considered as exports at the hands of the Applicant under the GST laws? 2) If the said transaction is held to be exports at the hands of the applicant under GST then whether it will qualify as zero rated supply? |
NO.GST-ARA- 57/2018-19/B- 130 Mumbai dated 23.10.2018 | 97(2) (v) | |
| 390 | SST Sutainable Transport Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. | Maharashtra | Under which Chapter Heading / Service Code our activity will classify ? |
NO.GST-ARA- 68/2018-19/B- 129 Mumbai dated 15.10.2018 | 97(2) (i) |





