| Sr. No. | Name of the Applicant | States/UT | Brief of Order in Appeal (OIA) | Order No. & Date | Download | Category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 121 | M/s. Crystal Crop Protection Ltd | Maharashtra | 1. Whether the transaction of transfer of business by way of merger of two GST registrations/ distinct persons would constitute ‘supply’ under the GST law? 2. Whether the transaction of transfer of business by way of merger of two GST registrations/ distinct persons would constitute ‘supply of goods’ under the GST law? 3. Whether merger between distinct persons would qualify as ‘transfer of business as going concern’ under the purview of GST Law? 4. Whether the transaction of transfer of business by way of merger of two GST registrations/ distinct persons would constitute ‘supply of services’ under the GST law? 5. If the transaction qualifies as ‘supply of services’, whether the said transaction would get covered under Sl. No. 2 of Notification no. 12/2017–C.T.(R) dated 28.06.2017, and therefore not liable to GST? 6. Whether Nagpur registration can file Form GST ITC-02 and transfer unutilized credit balance to Akola registration? 7. In case the Applicant merges the business of Akola registration, then can the Applicant claim credit balance appearing in Akola registration via Form GST ITC 02A in Nagpur registration? |
GST-ARA-31/2021-22/B-50 Mumbai Dated 21.04.2022 | 97(2)(b), (d), (e ) & (g) | |
| 122 | M/s. Mahalakshmi Infraprojects Pvt Ltd | Maharashtra | 1. If the tax rate of M/s. Mahalaxmi B T Patil Honai Constructions JV (Referred to as JV) is NIL as per SI No 3A- Chapter No. 9954 as per Notification No. 12/2017- C.T. (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, as amended by Notification No. 2/2018-Central Tax (Rate) dated 25th January 2018, w.e.f. 25th January 2018, whether we can avail the benefit of the same tax rate i.e. NIL? 2. If the above answer is negative, then Advance Ruling for whether we can avail the benefit of SI No 3 (x) - Chapter No. 9954 as per Notification No. 01/2018-C.T. (Rate) dated 25th January 2018 (amendment in the Notification No 11/2017- C.T. (Rate) dated 28th June 2017)? |
GST-ARA-34/2020-21/B-48 Mumbai Dated 18.04.2022 | 97(2)(b) | |
| 123 | M/s. B.T.Patil & Sons Belgaum Construction Pvt Ltd | Maharashtra | A) If the tax rate of M/s. Mahalaxmi B T Patil Honai Constructions JV (Referred to as JV) is NIL as per SI No 3A- Chapter No. 9954 as per Notification No. 12/2017 C.T. (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, as amended by Notification No. 2/2018-C.T. (Rate) dated 25.01.2018, whether we can avail the benefit of the same tax rate i.e. NIL? B) If the above answer is negative, then whether we can avail the benefit of SI No 3 (x) – Chapter No. 9954 as per Notification No. 01/2018-C.T. (Rate) dated 25.01.2018 (amendments in the Notification No 11/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated 18th June 2017)? |
GST-ARA-35/2020-21/B-49 Mumbai Dated 18.04.2022 | 97(2)(b) | |
| 124 | M/s. Mahalakshmi BT Patil Honai Consrtructions (JV) | Maharashtra | 1.Whether the said contract is covered under the term "Earth Work" and therefore covered under SI No 3A- Chapter No. 9954 as per Notification No. 12/2017-C.T. (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, as amended by Notification No. 2/2018-C.T. (Rate) dated 25.01.2018, w.e.f. 25.01.2018? 2.If the above answer is negative, then whether the said contract is covered under the term "Earth Work” and therefore covered under SI No - Chapter No. 9954 as per Notification No. 31/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 13th October 2017? 3.If we are covered any of above Notifications i.e. 31/2017-Central Tax (Rate) or 02/2018 Central Tax (Rate) then what is the meaning of “Earthwork”? |
GST-ARA-33/2020-21/B-47 Mumbai Dated 12.04.2022 | 97(2)(b) | |
| 125 | M/s. Rich Products & Solutions Pvt Ltd | Maharashtra | Whether (a) ‘Rich’s Nugel Fruit Strawberry Glaze’, (b) ‘Rich’s Nugel Fruit Orange Glaze’, and (c) ‘Rich’s Nugel Fruit Raspberry Glaze’ used for decoration of cakes, pastry and desserts are classifiable under Heading 21039090? If not, then what is the correct classification? |
GST-ARA-60/2021-22/B- 43 Mumbai Dated 05.04.2022 | 97(2)(a) | |
| 126 | M/s. Shri Venkateshwara Infrastructure J V | Maharashtra | 1. In view of the description of the work order of the Central Railway Department carried out by the tax payer, whether the Notification No. 31/2017-C. T. (Rate) dated 13.10.2017, in respect of composite supply of works contract the GST Rate @ 5% i.e. 2.50% CGST, 2.50% SGST as per sub clause (Vii) of the clause 119 of Section 2 of the CGST Act 2017 is applicable to the Tax Payer.? |
GST-ARA- 75 /2020-21/B-40 Mumbai dated 31.03.2022 | 97 (2) (b) | |
| 127 | M/s. Worley Services India Private Limited. | Maharashtra | A. Whether the services provided by the Applicant are classified under Sl No. 24(ii) of heading 9986 of the Rate Notification as ‘Support services to exploration, mining or drilling of petroleum crude or natural gas or both’ under SAC 998621 and attracts GST @ 12% in terms of Sl. No. 24(ii) of Rate Notification? |
GST-ARA- 27 /2020-21/B-38 Mumbai dated 31.03.2022 | 97 (2) (a) &(e) | |
| 128 | M/s. Lloyds Register Consulting Energy Private Limited | Maharashtra | Whether the project management consultancy services provided by the applicant to Vedanta Limited (Division: Cairn Oil & Gas) would be liable to GST at the rate of 12% from January 2018 under Sr. No. 21(ia), under Service Accounting Code (“SAC”) 9983 stating “Other professional, technical and business services”, of Notification No. 11/2017- C.T. (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, as inserted vide Notification No. 20/2019-C.T.(Rate), dated 30.09.2019 since the said amendment is clarification to the amendment made vide Notification No. 1/2018 – C.T.(Rate) dated 25 January 2018 reducing GST rate for service of exploration, mining or drilling of petroleum crude or natural gas or both to 12% |
GST-ARA- 04 /2020-21/B-37 Mumbai dated 31.03.2022 | 97 (2) (a) | |
| 129 | M/s. NAVRATNA SHIPPING PRIVATE LIMITED | Maharashtra | 1.The tax rate for providing service of Coastal and transoceanic water transport |
GST-ARA- 24 /2020-21/B-39 Mumbai dated 31.03.2022 | 97 (2) (a) | |
| 130 | M/s. B P Sangle Constructions Pvt. Ltd. | Maharashtra | NHAI has awarded a contract for construction of road to the applicant vide letter dt 01.05.2017 for agreed price of Rs. 65,90,98,099/- which included VAT Tax as tender was awarded before the appointed date. However, during the course of completion of service, i.e. construction of road as per contract, there happens escalation in value. Such escalation in value is added to the contract value as per the terms of the tender notice which read as under: 19.10.04:- The contract price shall be adjusted for increase or decrease in rates and price of labour, cement, steel, plant, machinery and spares, bitumen, fuel and lubricants and other material inputs in accordance with the principles, procedures and formulae specified therein. Question based on these facts is as to whether such escalated value shall be added to the taxable value u/s 15 of the act or otherwise? |
GST-ARA- 44 /2020-21/B-41 Mumbai dated 31.03.2022 | 97 (2) (c) |





