Appellate Orders

Appeal by the party is rejected. Activities undertaken by the Appellant are classifiable under SAC 9973 under Entry No.17 Sub Entry (viii) and attract 18% GST. 

Appeal by the party is partly allowed to the extent that Solar Power Device attract 9.8 % GST.

Appeal by the party is rejected.

ITC of GST paid in Haryana by the Appellant is not available ;  The Appellant is registered in Rajasthan.

The order issued by the original authority for advance ruling is set aside. The appellant can avail Input tax credit of the full GST charged on the undiscounted supply invoice of goods/services by their suppliers. A proportionate reversal of the credit is not required to be done by them in case of a post purchase discount given by the supplier to them throught the C2FO platform, in the circumstances mentioned by the appellant. This is subject to their fulfilling the other conditions stipulated by law and that the GST paid by them for the said goods/services is not reversed or reimbursed/ re-credited etc to them in any manner by the supplier or on his behalf after the credit has been availed by the appellant. The ruling is limited to cases where a post purchase discount is extended by the supplier of goods or services to the appellant on account of their registering in the interactive automated data exchange arrangement setup by C2FO India LLP, which is the subject matter of this advance ruling.

The Order 37/AAR/2019 dated 21.10.2019 passed by the lower authority in the case of the appellant is set aside. The matter is remanded to the lower authority for consideration and passing of appropriate orders on whether issue raised in the application by the appellant was already pending before the department after extending opportunity to the appellant.

Order of AAR confirmed.

Order of AAR confirmed.

Order of AAR confirmed.

The Appellate authority set aside the Order of the AAR and hold that the amount collected as membership subscription and admission fees from members is not liable to GST as supply of services.

The Appellate authority set aside the Order of the AAR classifying the product Prohance-D (Chocolate) under heading 21069050 and furhter held that the product would instead classify as a diabetic food covered under chapter heading 21069091.