Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR)

Sr. No. Name of the Applicant States/UT Brief of Order ­in ­Appeal (OIA) Order No. & Date Download Category
1091 M/s WEG Industries India Private Limited Tamil Nadu

1. Whether the relaxations provided vide the notification of 35/2020 – Central tax Dated April 3, 2020, for completion of various compliance actions would apply to the time limit provided for the export of goods under notification no. 41/2017 – Integrated tax (rate) Dated October 23, 2017.

2.  Whether under the facts and circumstances of the present case, even where the goods were exported on 10 June 2020 with a delay of one day over and above the 90 days specified as under notification no. 41/2017 – Integrated tax (rate) Dated October 23, 2017, the benefit of concessional rate of 0.1% IGST would still be available in view of the extension of time limit granted by notification of 35/2020 – Central tax Dated April 3, 2020

TN/41/ARA/2021 Dated 30.11.2021

(Size: 4.4 MB)

97(2)(a)
1092 M/s CORAL COIL INDIA LIMITED Tamil Nadu

Whether the supply of Stator Coil by the Applicant to M/s.Coral Manufacturing Works India Private Ltd., will be eligible for the levy of 2.5% CGST in terms of Sl. No. 234 in the notification 1-CTR dated 28 June 2017 and 2.5% SGST in terms of the corresponding SGST notification

TN/40/ARA/2021 Dated 30.11.2021

(Size: 4.11 MB)

97(2)(b)
1093 M/s BOOKWATER TECH PRIVATE LIMITED Tamil Nadu

1.Supply of raw water falls under exempt goods under GST. Does raw water that is supplied through tankers through the Bookwater platform come under exempted goods as well?

2. Does the supplier of water through tankers come under supply of raw water or under transport services?

3. Does Bookwater have to withhold any tax-GST TCS 1% from the suppliers before making payments for the supply of raw water through our platform?

4. Is the supplier making raw water sale is required to register under GST since they are transacting through an e commerce operator?

5. Does Sewage Evacuation come under 18% GST? If yes, most individual sewage tanker operators have turnover less than 20lakhs per annum. Since we are not billing the customer directly and are only billing on behalf of the supplier, will the exemption limit of Rs.20Lakhs per annum be applicable to suppliers individually?

6. Consequently, is GST Registration applicable for all suppliers through the Bookwater platform or only applicable for those suppliers who have a turnover over 20Lakhs?

7. Does Bookwater have to withhold any tax (GST TCS 1% applicability) from the suppliers before making payments since the supplies have been made through our digital platform and we also deduct our charges for our services rendered before making payments?

TN/42/ARA/2021 Dated 30.11.2021

(Size: 5.14 MB)

97(2)(e)
1094 M/s NEW PANDIAN TRAVELS PRIVATE LIMITED Tamil Nadu

Whether the GST paid on the Motor cars of seating capacity not exceeding 13 (including Driver) leased or rented to customers will be available to it as INPUT TAX CREDIR (ITC) in terms of Section 17(5)(a)(A) of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017?

2. Whether the GST paid on the Motor cars of seating capacity not exceeding 13 (including Driver) registered as public vehicle with RTO to transport passengers, provided to their different customers on lease or rental or hire will be available to it as INPUT TAX CREDIT (ITC) in terms of Section 17(5)(a)(B) of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017.

3. Whether the supply of services by way of Renting or Leasing or Hiring Motor Vehicles to SEZ to transport the employees of the customers without payment of IGST under LUT is deemed as taxable supply and whether ITC is admissible on Motor Vehicles procured and used commonly for such supply to SEZ and other than SEZ supplies?

TN/43/ARA/2021 Dated 30.11.2021

(Size: 1.13 MB)

97(2)(d)
1095 Bank Note Paper Mill India Pvt. Ltd Karnataka

a. Applicability of GSTon Liquidated damages for delay in supply as penalty (this is in nature of penalty)
b. Applicability of GST on Liquidated damages for compensation of extra cost on account of default from the supplier (this is in the nature of abetment to the cost of purchase)c. Applicability of GST on sale of tender form/fees for participation in the tender. This being a nominal fees collected just to have seriously interested participation. (this is in the form of avoiding non-serious participation) But the Applicant, vide their letter dated 25.08.2021, has requested this authority to quash the application filed for advance ruling, quoting the reason that they have already got the clarity on the applicability of GST on the transactions for which advance ruling was sought and that they do not require any further proceedings. Further the applicant has to discharge fee of Rs.5,000/- each under the CGST Act 2017 as well as KGST ct 2017 as per Section 97(1), whereas the applicant has discharged the fee of Rs.5,000/- under KGST Act 2017 only and hence the instant application is liable for rejection under Section 98(2) of the CGST Act 2017. The application filed by the Applicant for advane ruling is hereby rejected for the reasons mentioned above.

KAR/ADRG/70/2021 dated 29-11-2021

(Size: 874.72 KB)

97(2)(g)
1096 Premier Solar Powertech Private Limited Karnataka

a. Whether supply of turnkey engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contract for construction of solar power plant wherein both goods and services are supplied can be construed to be a composite supply in terms of Section 2(30) of CGST Act 2017?
b. Whether the supply of 'Solar Power Generating System' is taxable at 5% GST? But the applicant, vide their letter dated 18.08.2021, requested this authority to permit them to withdraw the application filed for advance ruling quoting the reason that they have got the clarity on manufacturing of solar power systems and the rate of tax applicable thereon from the Notification No.24/2018-Central Tax (Rate) dated 31.12.2018. Further the applicant has to discharge fee of Rs.5,000/- each under CGST Act 2017 as well as KGST Act 2017 as per Section 97(1), whereas the applicant has not discharged the fee of Rs.5,000/- each under any of the CGST/KGST Act 2017 and hence the instant application is liable for rejction under Section 98(2) of CGST Act 2017. The application filed by the Applicant for advane ruling is hereby rejected for the reasons mentioned above.

KAR/ADRG/68/2021 dated 29-11-2021

(Size: 841.84 KB)

97(2)(a)&(e)
1097 Pavan Ventures. Karnataka

a. The firm supplies food in a day out package along with sports and adventure activities, whether it constitutes mixed supply? If yes, what is the rate of GST? 
b. If services provided on a day out package along with food, what is the GST rate? Or can food be charged at 5% GST? 
c. If a customer avails only restaurant facility, what is the GST rate? 
d. When the room tariff is below Rs.7,500/- per day, what is the GST rate for room rent and what is the GST rate for the food supplied to room? 
e. The corporate companies book rooms/halls for their meetings & other occasions where food is supplied as complementary, whether it constitutes mixed supply if yes, what is the rate of GST? Or can GST of 5% be charged for the food seperately?
f. If any person avails only restaurant facilities only, what is the percentage of GST? But the Applicant requested to permit them to withdraw the application filed for advance ruling vide their letter dated 24.08.2021. Hence the application filed by the appliclant for advance ruling is disposed off as withdrawn.

KAR/ADRG/72/2021 dated 29-11-2021

(Size: 856.63 KB)

97(2)(a)(c)(d)(e)&(g)
1098 Maddi Sumalatha, Prop. M/s Sri. Venkataramana Agencies. Karnataka

"Rate of GST applicable to "Areca Leaf Plates" Machine pressed) But the Applicant, vide their email dated 29.10.2021, has informed this authority that they wish wish to withdraw their application. Further the applicant has to discharge fee of Rs.5,000/- each in terms of Section 97(1) of the CGST Act 2017 as well as the KGST ACt 2017 , whereas the applicant has discharged the fee of Rs.5,000/- under KGST Act 2017 only and hence the instant application is liable for rejection under Section 98(2) of the CGST Act 2017. The application filed by the Applicant for advane ruling is hereby rejected for the reasons mentioned above.

KAR/ADRG/71/2021 dated 29-11-2021

(Size: 794.14 KB)

97(2)(a)&(e)
1099 Johnson Lifts Pvt. Ltd. Karnataka

a. Whether Sl.No.3(v)(b) of Notification 11/2017-CT(Rate)-6% CGST is available, when- (a) Such building consists of more than one residential unit and falls under the definition of "residential complex" But the Applicant, vide their letter dated 26.08.2021, informed this authority that they withdraw their application, filed for advance ruling. Further the applicant has to discharge fee of Rs.5,000/- each under CGST Act 2017 as well as the KGST Act 2017 as per Section 97(1), whereas the applicant has discharged the fee of Rs.5,000/- under the KGST Act 2017 only and hence the instant application is liable for rejection under Section 98(2) of the CGST Act 2017. .

KAR/ADRG/69/2021 dated 29-11-2021

(Size: 812.64 KB)

97(2)(b)&(e)
1100 Metalex Steel Strips Pvt. Ltd. Karnataka

"We do job work of slitting, cut to length and matt finishing of stainless steel sheets with HSN code 9988. Further above type of job work what value to be mentioned in e-way bill whether goods value or job work charges only." But the applicant, vide their letter dated 17.08.2021, requested this authority to permit them to withdraw the instant application filed for advance ruling, for the reason that, they have got the clarifications for the question from Circular No.126/45/2019-GST dated 22.11.2019, issued by CBIC. However, the issue on which the applicant has sought advance ruling is not in respect of any of the issues covered under Section 97(2) of the CGST/KGST Act 2017. Further the applicant has to discharge fee of Rs.5,000/- each in terms of Section 97(1) of the CGST Act 2017 as well as KGST Act 2017, whereas the applicant has discharged the fee of Rs.5,000/- under KGST Act 2017 only and hence the instant application is liable for rejection under Section 98(2) of CGST Act 2017. The application filed by the Applicant for advane ruling is hereby rejected for the reasons mentioned above.

KAR/ADRG/66/2021 dated 29-11-2021

(Size: 863.71 KB)

97(2) (e)