Sr. No. | Name of the Applicant | States/UT | Brief of Order in Appeal (OIA) | Order No. & Date | Download | Category |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
201 | M/s DINDAYAL COLLOIDS PRIVATE LIMITED, | Rajasthan | The Classification and applicable rate of GST and/ or Compensation Cess on product ‘Tobacco pre-mixed with lime. |
RAJ/AAR/2024-25/09 Dated 26.06.2024 | 97 (2) (a) | |
202 | M/s. STUDIO 30 ARCHITECTS AND PLANNERS | Karnataka | Whether the provisions of section 12(3) of the IGST Act 2017 are applicable to a sub-consultant? The application filed by the Applicant for Advance Ruling disposed off as withdrawn. |
KAR ADRG 21/2024 Dated 25.06.2024 | - | |
203 | M/s Metropolitan Transport Corporation | Tamil Nadu | 1) Is collection of increased rents for the past period considered as the term “supply” under Goods and Service Tax? (I) If the answer to the first question is yes, {a} is the entire increased amount of Rs, 1,60,42,203 subject to GST? OR {b) is only the portion of the invoice value of Rs.99,19,432 relating to after July 1, 2017, liable for GST and the rest Rs.61,22,771 were exempt as it related to service tax period? |
TN/12/AAR/2024, Dated 25.06.2024 | 97(2)(e)(g) | |
204 | M/s. PAN OFFICE SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED | Karnataka | a. Should ARN/RFD-11 LUT copy accompany the Invoice? b. Can the ARN number of RFD-11 LUT be affixed on the invoice by sticker or should it be printed or can it be written by pen? c. If ARN/RFD-11 number is written/stickered on the invoice, should any additional document accompany the same? The application filed by the Applicant for Advance Ruling disposed off as withdrawn. |
KAR ADRG 25/2024 Dated 25.06.2024 | - | |
205 | VINAY RAVEENDRA BABALESHWAR (M/s. Shreyas Enterprises) | Karnataka | The application filed by the Applicant for Advance Ruling disposed off as withdrawn. |
KAR ADRG 26/2024 Dated 25.06.2024 | - | |
206 | M/s. T S TRANSPORT | Karnataka | The application filed by the Applicant for Advance Ruling rejected in terms of Section 98(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 |
KAR ADRG 24/2024 Dated 25.06.2024 | - | |
207 | M/s. GRASIM INDUSTRIES LIMITED | Karnataka | The application filed by the Applicant for Advance Ruling disposed off as withdrawn. |
KAR ADRG 29/2024 Dated 25.06.2024 | - | |
208 | M/s. METAYAGE IP STRATEGY CONSULTING LLP | Karnataka | The application filed by the Applicant for Advance Ruling disposed off as withdrawn. |
KAR ADRG 28/2024 Dated 25.06.2024 | - | |
209 | KANCHU SHIVA KUMAR ( M/s. Shrusti Constructions) | Karnataka | The application filed by the Applicant for Advance Ruling disposed off as withdrawn. |
KAR ADRG 27/2024 Dated 25.06.2024 | - | |
210 | M/s. SAVITA PANDURANG RADDI | Karnataka | a. What is the classification of service provided in accordance with Notification No.11/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 read with annexure attached to it, by the State of Karnataka to us for which royalty is being paid? b. Whether the said service can be classified under the 9973 specifically under 997337 as Licensing services for the right to mining including its exploration and evaluation or as any other service? c. Whether service provided by state Government of Karnataka is governed by the applicability of Notification No 13/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 under entry number 5 and whether we are taxable person in this case to discharge GST under reverse charge mechanism or whether given service is covered by exclusion clause number (1) of entry 5 and state Government of Karnataka is liable to discharge GST on same d. Whether royalty paid in respect of mining lease can be classified under “Licensing for the right to use minerals including its exploration falling under the Heading 9973 attracting GST at the same rate of tax as applicable on supply of like goods involving transfer in goods? The application filed by the Applicant for Advance Ruling disposed off as withdrawn |
KAR ADRG 23/2024 Dated 25.06.2024 | - |