| Sr. No. | Name of the Applicant | States/UT | Brief of Order in Appeal (OIA) | Order No. & Date | Download | Category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2441 | M/s. R R Enterprises | Haryana | Whether the provision of services (Manpower Supply) of tube well operator for operation of tube well and booster of drinking and irrigation water supply in various villages covered under Panchayat are exempt or taxable? |
HAR/HAAR/2018-19/37 dated 13.02.2019 | 97(2)(b) & (e) | |
| 2442 | Indian Institute of Science Education and Research | Odisha | Applicability of notification issued under the provisions of GST Act, and Determination of the liability to pay tax on any goods or services or both. |
07/Odisha/AAR/18-19 dated 13.02.2019 | 97(2) (b)& (e) | |
| 2443 | Balasore Alloys Ltd. | Odisha | Applicability of notification issued under the provisions of GST Act, |
08/Odisha/AAR/18-19 dated 13.02.2019 | 97(2)(b) | |
| 2444 | M/s Autometer Alliance Ltd. | Uttar Pradesh | The issue is in relation to classification of Vigilance Control Device (VCD), Diagnostic Terminal, (DT), and Master Controller System (MCS), (hereinafter collectively referred to as “products’’) supplied by the applicant. |
UP_AAR_24 dated 11.02.2019 | 97(2)(a) | |
| 2445 | Elefo Biotech Pvt. Ltd. | Uttarakhand | Recommendation on the HSN code and applicable tax rate to be used under GST for the AMI (said product) 3002-HS Code of Antisera and other blood fractions and modified immunological products, whether or not obtained by means of biotechnological process. |
Ruling No.18 dated 07.02.2019 | 97(2)(a) | |
| 2446 | Opto Electronic Factory | Uttarakhand | Classification and Rate of Applicable GST on various equipment manufactured for being used exclusively in various Tanks. |
Ruling No.19 dated 07.02.2019 | 97(2)(a) | |
| 2447 | PrabhatGudakhu Factory | Odisha | Classification of Gudkhu under GST Act, 2017. |
06/Odisha/AAR/18-19 dated 05.02.2019 | 97(2)(a) | |
| 2448 | Goodwear fashion Pvt. Ltd. SIDCUL Pantnagar. | Uttarakhand | 1)Whether interlining fabrics is Classified under HSN code 5903 or should be Classified as further bland of yarn (In chapter 52-55)? |
Ruling No.16 dated 30.01.2019 | 97(2)(a) | |
| 2449 | Tanakpur Jalvidhyut Pariyojna Banbasa Champawat. | Uttarakhand | 1)As per the Advance Ruling Tanakpur power station, NHPC has been exempted from GST as per notification no. 12/2017,central tax(Rate) dated 28-06-17 (as amended time to time) but will this entails other agencies and contractor/ sub-contractors not to charge GST in their invoices. If the activity of constructing Indo-Nepal border rode is exempted as per advance ruling will this permit all the contractor and sub-contractors involved in this project be exempted or otherwise? |
Ruling No.17 dated 30.01.2019 | 97(2)(a) | |
| 2450 | Technip UK Limited | Maharashtra | (a) Whether the terms of the NIT, in particular its self-styled description as 'lump sum turnkey' contract, renders it as a 'works contract as understood under the GST law? (b) In the event the answer to (a) is in the affirmative, does it imply that each and every supply made to ONGC under the contract would be subject to rate of tax as applicable to a 'works contract'? ( c) In the event the answer to (a) is in the affirmative; (A) Will the position change if the members of the consortium raise distinct invoices and ONGC also pays directly to the members? (B) Can it be said that in such circumstances the individual invoices will not be affected by the overall description as a 'works contract'? (d) In the event the answer to (a) is in the affirmative and only one single rate of tax applies to the entire contract, can the members of the claim rate of tax in terms of Notification No. 39/2017 - Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 13.10.2017? (e) In the given facts of the instant application, can the member of the consortium supplying goods alone claim concessional rate of tax of 5% in terms of Notification No. 3/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017? |
NO.GST-ARA- 77/2018-19/B- 17 Mumbai dated 29.01.2019 | 97(2) (i) (ii) (v) |









