| Sr. No. | Name of the Applicant | States/UT | Brief of Order in Appeal (OIA) | Order No. & Date | Download | Category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2851 | Aditya Birla Retail Ltd. | Maharashtra | (a) Whether the subject goods, proposed to be sold under Stream 1, where the package of the subject goods would merely have a declaration mentioning the name and registered address of the Applicant as the manufacturer, as per the statutory requirement under Subject Statutory Provisions, can be considered as ‘not bearing a brand name’, and, accordingly eligible for exemption from GST in terms of relevant entries to Notification No. 2/2017 Central tax (Rate) dated 28th June 2017 (‘CGST Notification’), and, the corresponding entries under Notification No. 2/2017-Intergrated tax (Rate) dated 28th June 2017 (‘IGST Notification’) and Notification No.2/2017-State Tax (Rate) dated 29th June 2017) [collectively referred to as ‘the Exemption Notifications’]? (b) Whether the subject goods proposed to be sold under Stream 2, where the package of the subject goods would have a declaration mentioning the name and registered address of the manufacturer as per the statutory requirement under the Subject Statutory Provisions as also the declaration ‘Marketed by- Aditya Birla Retail Limited’ can be considered as ‘not bearing a brand name’, and, accordingly eligible for exemption in terms of relevant entries to the Exemption Notifications? (c) Whether the declarations made on the package, by inter alia using common/ generic terms viz. ‘Value’, ‘Choice’ and ‘Superior’, for the sole purpose of indicating the quality of the product so as to enable the customers to identify and buy products based on their requirements, budget and preferences can be construed to be a ‘brand name’ for the purpose of the Exemption Notifications? |
GST-ARA-13/2017/B-16 Mumbai, dt. 23.03.2018 | 97(2) (b) | |
| 2852 | Acrymold | Maharashtra | 1. If the word TROPHY is specifically mentioned under 83062920, so can we sell all trophies made of any material under this HSN? 2. If different code is allocated to trophies assembled of different material, I would like to know if there is a combination of different materials and about 75% (value terms) is getting used of any one Raw Material, under which HSN should we make bill ? |
GST-ARA-12/2017/B-15 Mumbai, dt. 23.03.2018 | 97(2) (a) | |
| 2853 | Tata Motors Limited | Maharashtra | 2. For a motor vehicle to get covered under above entry as SUV/ UV, whether it has to satisfy only the conditions mentioned in main clause i.e. engine capacity above 1500 cc and popularly known as SUV/ UV or in addition, it has to also satisfy the conditions mentioned in Explanation" i.e. length exceeding 4000 mm and ground clearance of 170 mm and above? In short, if the vehicle satisfies only the conditions mentioned in main clause but is not satisfying any one or all of the conditions mentioned in Explanation', whether it would still be covered under Entry at Sr. No. 52B of Notification No. 1/2017-Compensation Cess (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 as amended? 3. For the purpose of Cess @ 22% under Sr. No: 52B of Notification No. 1/2017 Compensation Cess (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 as amended, whether the ground clearance of the vehicle is to be considered in laden condition or in unladen condition? 4. Whether Tata Harrier vehicle whose ground clearance in unladen condition is 205 mm and in laden condition is 160 mm, would fall under Sr. No. 52B of the Notification No. 1/2017-Compensation Cess. (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 as amended? 5. Whether GST Compensation Cess @ 22% under Sr. No. 52B of Notification No. 1/2017-Compensation Cess (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 as amended, will be applicable to Tata Harrier vehicle? 6. Vehicle whose ground clearance in unladen condition is more than 170 mm but below 170mm in laden condition, whether will get covered under Sr. No. 52B of Notification No. 1/2017-Compensation Cess (Rate) dated 28.06.2017? |
NO.GST-ARA- 104/2018-19/B- 32 Mumbai dated 22.03.2019 | 97(2) (a)&(e) | |
| 2854 | M/s AnanyaGoel | Uttar Pradesh | Manufacturing food as take away only with no sitting facility, is a restaurant service or manufacturing of goods. |
UP_AAR_01 dated 21.03.2018 | 97(2)(a) | |
| 2855 | M/S Siddhu Mal Paper Conversion Com Pvt. Ltd. | Uttar Pradesh | उ0प्र0 राज्य सरकार द्वारा लागू ई-वे बिल की अनिवार्यता है अथवा नही । |
UP_AAR_02 dated 21.03.2018 | 97(2)(b) | |
| 2856 | M/s Giriraj Renewables Private ltd. | Karnataka | a) Whether supply of turnkey Engineering, Procurement & Construction (‘EPC’) Contract for construction of solar power plant wherein both goods and services are supplied can be construed to be a Composite Supply in terms of Section 2(30) of CGST Act, 2017. |
01 dated 21-03-2018 | 97 (2)(e ) (g) | |
| 2857 | M/s Gogte Infrastructure Development Corporation limited | Karnataka | a)Supply of Resturant And lodging servcies to employees ,customers,visitors & gusets of SEZ units in karnataka. b) "Exemption to SEZ units located in state of Karnatka. a) Section 7(5) (b) of the IGST Act :treats supply of Goods /Services to or by SEZ as a deemed Interstate supply b) Section 16(1) (b) of the IGST Act : defines the term "Zero rated Supplies " to include Exoprts and supply of goods/Services to SEZ's c) & e)Whether the Hotel Accommodation & Restaurant services provided by them, within the premises of the Hotel, to the employees & guests of SEZ units, be treated as supply of goods & services to SEZ units in Karnataka or not ?” |
02 dated 21-03-2018 | 97 (2) (a) (b) (c) (e ) | |
| 2858 | M/s Skilltech Engineers & Contractors Private limited | Karnataka | 1. “Whether the contract, executed by them for KPTCL, is a divisible contract [Supply of goods & Supply of Services] or an indivisible contract [ works contract]?” 2. “Whether the tax rate of 12% [CGST-6% + SGST-6%] is applicable to the above contract, in pursuance of Notification No.24/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 21.09.2017?” |
03 dated 21-03-2018 | 97 (2)(a ) (b) | |
| 2859 | M/s Sayre Therapuetics Private Limited | Karnataka | Health care services provided by clinical establishments, an authorised medical practitioner or para-medics are exempted vide SL.No.74 of the Notification No. 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June, 2017. Therefore the issue/s before us to decide are a. Whether the Applicant qualifies as clinical establishment? b. Whether the services provided by the applicant qualifies to be health care services? |
05 dated 21-03-2018 | 97 (2) (b) (e ) | |
| 2860 | Global Reach Education Services Pvt Ltd | West Bengal | Whether the service provided to the Universities abroad is to be considered “export” within the meaning of Section 2(6) of the Integrated Goods and Services Act, 2017 ? |
02/WBAAR/2017-18 dated 21/03/2018 | 97(2) (e) |









