| Sr. No. | Name of the Applicant | States/UT | Appeal Order No. & Date | Brief of Order in Appeal (OIA) | Download | AR Order No. and Date, against which Appeal has been filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 291 | M/s Halliburton Offshore Services Inc (Oil India) | Andhra Pradesh | AAAR/AP/06(GST)/2020 dated 09.11.2020 | Uphold the ruling pronounced by the Authority for Advance ruling.. |
|
AAR No.15/AP/GST/2020 dated: 13.05.2020 |
| 292 | M/s Halliburton Offshore Services Inc (Drill Bits) | Andhra Pradesh | AAAR/AP/05(GST)/2020 dated 28.09.2020 | The Authority does not find any reason to interfere with the ruling pronounced by the Authority for Advance ruling. |
|
AAR No.07/AP/GST/2020 dated: 25.02.2020 |
| 293 | M/s Master Minds | Andhra Pradesh | AAAR/AP/04(GST)/2020 dated 28.09.2020 | The Authority does not find any reason to interfere with the ruling pronounced by the Authority for Advance ruling. |
|
AAR No.08/AP/GST/2020 dated:05.03.2020 |
| 294 | M/s Ushabala Chits Private Limited | Andhra Pradesh | AAAR/AP/03(GST)/2020 dated 21.09.2020 | The rulings of the Authority for Advance Ruling vide their order No. AARNo.13/AP/GST/2020 dated 05.05.2020 stands modified. |
|
AAR No.13/AP/GST/2020 dated:05.05.2020 |
| 295 | M/s DKV Enterprises Private Limited | Andhra Pradesh | AAAR/AP/02(GST)/2020 dated 31.08.2020 | Request was made by the appellant to remand back the case to its original authority in light of the recent developments in the subject case, referring to a judgment in case of IBM India Pvt Ltd. v.s Commissioner of Central Excise & State Taxes., Bangalore-LTU, reported in 34 GSTL page 436. Consequent upon the request of the appellant, the authority remanded the case back to its original Authority to examine afresh and dispose accordingly. |
|
AAR No.04/AP/GST/2020 dated:24.02.2020 |
| 296 | The Superintendent of Central Tax, Central GST, Range-Ravulapalem, Rajamahendravaram, Andhra Pradesh | Andhra Pradesh | AAAR/AP/01(GST)/2020 dated 07.07.2020 | The order of the Authority for Advance (AAR), Andhra Pradesh in case of M/s Vinayaka Constructions is upheld on merit. |
|
AAR No.37/AP/GST/2019 dated: 12.12.2019 |
| 297 | M/s Southern Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Limited | Andhra Pradesh | AAAR/AP/05(GST)/2019 dated 11.12.2019 | The Ruling of the AAR is in tune with legal position and it needs no interference and the appeal is accordingly dismissed. |
|
AAR/AP/22(GST)/2019 dated 08.07.2019 |
| 298 | M/s Sri Chakra Milk Products LLP | Andhra Pradesh | AAAR/AP/04(GST)/2019 dated 09.12.2019 | The Ruling of the AAR is in tune with legal position and it needs no interference and the appeal is accordingly dismissed. |
|
AAR/AP/27(GST)/2018 dated 15.07.2019 |
| 299 | M/s Vijai Electricals Limited | Andhra Pradesh | AAAR/AP/03(GST)/2019 dated 24.04.2019 | Uphold the decision of the Authority for Advance Ruling, A.P confirming that the work contracts service rendered by M/s Vijai Electricals (the appellant) to APEPDCL is not eligible for concessional rate of tax 12% as per serial no. 3 of entry no.vi (a) of notification no. 24/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 21-09-2017. |
|
AAR/AP/29(GST)/2018 dated 19.12.2018 |
| 300 | M/s Jayalakshmi Tobacco Company | Andhra Pradesh | AAAR/AP/02(GST)/2019 dated 12.04.2019 | M/s. Jayalakshmi Tobacco Company in their letter dated 13-02-2019 stated that they had applied for cancellation of registration and they no longer required any ruling and requested to consider their application for Advance Ruling as withdrawn. |
|
AAR/AP/03(GST)/2018 dated 08.06.2018 |
Appellate Orders
Useful Links
Contact GST Council
Copyright © 2024 Ministry of Finance, Government of India. All rights reserved