Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR)

The product ‘Maize Bran’ manufactured and supplied by M/s. Sayaji Industries Ltd. is covered under Entry Sr.No.103A of Notification No.1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 of the CGST Act, 2017 on which rate of GST chargeable is 5% (2.5% SGST + 2.5% CGST).

A. Whether the treatment or process of body building by fabrication and other processes carried out on chasis of motor vehicle owned by others is supply of services?

B. If the above stated activity of body building is considered as supply of service in terms of description given at paragraph 3 of Schedule II of the CGST Act, 2017 what will be the rate of GST applicable on such service?

C. What will be the service Code (tariff) for above stated activity of body building carried out on another person’s chasis of motor vehicle?

D. What would be the classification and applicable rate of tax for the activity of accident repairing job on the vehicle supplied by the owner for such job if a lump sum price is charged that includes cost of material and labour?

E. If the above stated activity of body building is not considered as supply of services, what will be the nature of this supply, tariff code and rate of GST for such supply? 

The product ‘Maize Bran’ manufactured and supplied by M/s. Gujarat Ambuja Exports ltd. is covered under Entry Sr.No.103A of Notification No.1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 of the CGST Act, 2017 on which rate of GST chargeable is 5% (2.5% SGST + 2.5% CGST).

    
The professional service for maintenance of accounts and allied items of work provided to  Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nagar Limited (SSNNL ) { A Government of Gujarat undertaking) by the applicant is a taxable service under Section 9 (1) of The CGST Act, 2017 or exempted vide Sr. No.3 of Not. No. 12/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.

The applicant M/s. Oswal Industries ltd. (M/s. Nimba Nature Cure Village) is not eligible to get the benefit of entry No.74 of exemption Notification No.12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. 

Q.1.Whether selling of residential flats after date of completion certificate of commercial shops or after first occupancy in building is exempt supply?

Q.2. Manner of reversal of ITC on expenses incurred upto date of completion certificate shops.

Q.3. Manner of claiming ITC on expenses incurred after date of completion certificate of commercial shops.

Whether supply of Fly Ash Bricks and Fly Ash Blocks are covered under Chapter heading 68159090 and liable to taxed @ 5% and @ 12% respectively under the GST Act?

Q.1  What is the classification of service provided in accordance with Notification 11/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 read with annexure attached to it, , for which royalty is being paid.

Q.2   What is rate of GST on given services provided by State of Gujarat to Giriraj Quarry Works for which Royalty is being paid?

The Applicant Company is registered in the State of Rajasthan and having GSTIN in State of Rajasthan. The Applicant company has entered into a long term Lease Agreement of 99 years with RLDA for undertaking residential & commercial development along with development of financial infrastructure as on 08.11.2019. The Applicant Company paid a sum of Rs. 158657105.00 in parts by way of RTGS on separate days in the month of February, 2019 as Security deposit which, in case of breach is refundable after forfeiting the bid security deposited separately for both the Plots as per the terms of the lease agreement which is Rs. 3300000.00 for Plot A and of Rs. 5200000.00 for Plot B. The issue to be examined in the present case is whether the amount paid prior to 29.03.2019 in pursuance to the lease agreement of 99 years executed on 08.11.2019 are exempt from levy of GST or not;

1. Applicant is engaged in the business of banking as a regional Rural Bank. It accepts deposit from its customers. It is statutorily require to pay premium to Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation (In short "DICGC) on these deposits, on which GST is collected by the DICGC. Now the bank is availing and intends continue to avail credit of GST paid, as prescribed under respective GST Acts, as it is an inward supply for the purpose of its banking business. To avoid any future litigation, bank now seeks advance ruling, whether input credit of GST on this inward supply is just and proper under the GST law?