M/s. Puranik Builders ltd.

We, hereby, partly set aside the MAAR Order No. GST-ARA-68/2019-20/B-52 dated 27.08.202 1 by holding that, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the other charges which are inextricably linked to services by way of construction of residential apartment /dwelling are part of a bundled service with principle service of construction of residential apartment /dwelling. The rate of tax applicable on such services would be 12% as applicable to the construction service. The other charges that don’t pass the muster of indicators of a bundled service are held as supply of independent services. They are to be taxed as per the respective SAC codes and rate of tax thereon. As per the submission of the appellant, he has collected 18% of GST on the supply of such services. In respect of services which are allowed as bundled services, the present decision implies an excess collection of tax. It is hereby directed that the Appellant to refund the excess tax collected to the customers. Thus, the appeal filed by the Appellant is, hereby, partly allowed.

States/UT
Appeal Order No. & Date
MAH/AAAR/DS-RM/19/2022-23 dated 30.03.2023.
AR Order No. and Date, against which Appeal has been filed
GST-ARA- 68/2019-20/B-52 dated 27.08.2021
Year