| Sr. No. | Name of the Applicant | States/UT | Appeal Order No. & Date | Brief of Order in Appeal (OIA) | Download | AR Order No. and Date, against which Appeal has been filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 131 | BEML Limited | Karnataka | KAR/AAAR/08/2021-22 dated 03.09.2021 | The Appellate Authority allowed the appeal filed by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax, Bangalore South Division-1, South Commissionerate and set aside the ruling given by the Authority for Advance Ruling in KAR ADRG 20/2021 dated 06-04-2021 with regard to composite supply. |
KAR/ADRG 20/2021 dated 06.04.2021 | |
| 132 | Airbus Group India Private Limited | Karnataka | KAR/AAAR/09/2021-22 dated 09.11.2021 | The Appellate Authority uphold the order No.KAR ADRG 31/2021 dated 01/07/2021 passed by the Advance Ruling Authority and the appeal filed by the Appellants M/s. Airbus Group India Private Limited, stands dismissed all accounts. |
KAR/ADRG 31/2021 dated 01-07-2021 | |
| 133 | Premier Sales Promotion Pvt. Ltd. | Karnataka | KAR/AAAR/11/2021-22 dated 22.12.2021 | We uphold the order No. KAR ADRG 37/2021 dated 30/07/2021 passed by the Advance Ruling Authority and the appeal filed by the Appellant M/s. Premier Sales Promotion Pvt. Ltd. Stands dismissed on all counts. |
KAR/ADRG 37/2021 dated 30.07.2021 | |
| 134 | Karnataka State Electronics Development Corporation Limited (Rectification of Mistake Order) | Karnataka | KAR/AAAR/ROM-01/2020-21 dated 08.03.2021 | Rectification order passed under section 102 of the GST Act 2017 pertaining to Karnataka State Electronics Development Corporation Limited. |
KAR/AAAR/04/2020-21 dated 27.09.2020 | |
| 135 | Parker Hannifin India Pvt. Ltd. (Rectification of mistake order) | Karnataka | KAR/AAAR/ROM-02/2021 dated 30/06/2021 | Rectification order passed under section 102 of the GST Act 2017 pertaining to Parker Hannifin India Pvt. Ltd. |
KAR/AAAR-07/2019-20 dated 10.01.2020 | |
| 136 | Pattabi Enterprises | Karnataka | KAR/AAAR-11/2019-20 dated 31.01.2020 | The appellate authority for advance ruling set aside the ruling passed under section 98(4) of the CGST Act 2017 vide NO.KAR ADRG 31/2019 dated12-09-2019 i.e. Contention of the appellant is dismissed on all accounts. |
KAR/ADRG 46/2019 dated 17.09. 2019 | |
| 137 | International Flower Auction Bangalore Ltd. | Karnataka | KAR/AAAR-12/2019-20 dated 05.02.2020 | The appellate authority for advance ruling set aside the ruling passed under section 98(4) of the CGST Act 2017 vide NO.KAR.ADRG 87/2019 dated 26-09-2019 i.e. Contention of the department appeal is allowed where in the question on which the advance ruling was sought for is answered as follows:The commission earned from auctioning of flowers is not eligible for exemption under entry no. 54(g) of Notification No.12/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and entry no. 54(g) of Notification (12/2017) FD 48 CSL 2017 dated 29.06.2017. |
KAR/ADRG 87/2019 dated 26.09.2019 | |
| 138 | Karnataka Co-operative Milk Producers Federation Ltd. | Karnataka | KAR/AAAR-13/2019-20 dated 11.02.2020 | The order No KAR ADRG 88/2019 dated 26.09.2019 passed by the Authority for Advance Ruling is declared voidable initio as it was vitiated by the process of suppression of material facts. Therefore, the appellate authority for advance ruling do not intend to give a ruling on the issue of classification since the matter is pending in a proceeding under this Act. Hence the appeal of the Department is allowed. |
KAR/ADRG 88/2019 dated 26.09.2019 | |
| 139 | Tarun Realtors Pvt. Ltd. | Karnataka | KAR/AAAR-14/2019-20 dated 06.02.2020 | The appellate authority for advance ruling uphold the ruling passed under section 98(4) of the CGST Act 2017 vide NO.KAR ADRG 103/2019 dated 30-09-2019 i.e. Contention of the appellant is dismissed on all accounts. |
KAR/ADRG 103/2019 dated 30.09.2019 | |
| 140 | Manipal Technologies Limited | Karnataka | KAR/AAAR-14-A/2019-20 dated 04.02.2020 | The appellate authority for advance ruling uphold the ruling passed under section 98(4) of the CGST Act 2017 vide NO.KAR ADRG 35/2019 dated 16-09-2019 i.e. Contention of the appellant is dismissed on all accounts. |
KAR/ADRG 35/2019 dated 16.09.2019 |









