Appellate Orders

The Appellate Authority find nothing objectionable in the order given by the M.P. Advance Ruling Authority and accordingly, dismiss the appeal of the Appellant.

The Appellant is able to pay GST under reverse charge on the contributions made to District Mineral Foundation (DMF) and National Mineral Exploration Trust (NMET) as per Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.

The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling upheld the order passed by the  Authority for Advance Ruling.

The Executive Post Graduate Programme in Management (EPGP) which is an intensive one year full time academic programme of IIM Indore, is a diploma course specially designed to enhance knowledge, skills and capabilities essential for managing and leading organizations. Participants who meet the academic requirement is awarded Executive Post Graduate Diploma at the annual convocation of the institute alongwith other degree and diploma programmes. In the light of circular no. 82/01/2019-GST from 31st January, 2018 onwards, the one year full time Executive Post Graduate Programme in Management (EPGP) of IIM Indore is exempt from GST.

We uphold the order No. KAR ADRG 07/2022 dated 08/03/2022 passed by the advance ruling authority and the appeal filed by the Appellant M/s. Teamlease Education Foundation, stands dismissed on all accounts.

We modify the order No. KAR ADRG 06/2022 dated 8th March 2022 passed by the Advance Ruling Authority as follows:

The question "Whether ITC can be claimed on common services which are utilized for both taxable as well as exempted supplies?" is admissible for advance ruling as it falls within the scope of Section 97(2)(d) of the CGSST Act.

We uphold the findings of the Authority for Advance Ruling with respect to questios 2 and 3 of their application and hold that they are not questions on which an advance ruling can be given.

The appeal filed by the Appellant, M/s Bharatiya Reserve Bank Note Mudran Pvt Ltd, is disposed off on the above terms.

Order No. UP ADGR-84/2021 dated 18.10.2021 issued by the Authority for Advance Ruling is upheld by the Appellate Authority.

(a) Activity of providing free complimentary tickets does not fall within the domain of supply as it does not have the element of consideration. However, where such complimentary tickets are being provided by the appellant to a related person or a distinct person the same shall fall within the ambit of supply on account of Schedule I of the Act and the appellant would be liable to pay tax on the same;

(b) The appellant would not be eligible to avail input tax credit in relation to such activity. But, where such activity or transaction is treated as supply on account of being provided by the appellant to a related person or a distinct person the appellant would be entitled to avail input tax credit for the same.

The Maharashtra Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, modified the Ruling passed by the MAAR vide order No. GST-ARA-35/2019-20/B-14 dated 24.05.2021, by holding that the host of activities performed by the Appellant at the behest of their Dubai Head Office will come under the ambit of "Supply" in terms of Section 7(1)(a) of the CGST Act, 2017, and are required to take GST registration, and discharge their IGST liability, if any, on the amount received from their Dubai Head Office. Thus, the Appeal filed by the Appellant is not maintainable, and hence hereby, dismissed.

The Maharashtra Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, set aside the impugned MAAR order dated 22.12.2021 and answered the questions raised by the Appellant as under:

(i) the Turmeric (Turmeric in Whole form - not in powder form) is covered under the definition of 'Agricultural Produce'. The HSN code of Turmeric is 0910 30 20 and the rate of GST is 5% (CGST @ 2.5%+ SGST@ 2.5%). However, the first supply of Turmeric (Turmeric in Whole form - not in powder from) by farmers, being supply by non-taxable person in Agricultural Produce and Marketing Committee, is not liable to GST by virtue of provisions of section 23 (1) (b) and 2 (107) of the CGST Act, 2017.

(ii) Services rendered by the Appellant as a Commission Agent in APMC, Sangli, are not liable to GST in terms of Sl. 54 Heading 9986 of Notification No.12/2017 CT(R) dated 28.06.2017 read with Sl. No. 24 of Notification No.11/2017-C.T. (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.

(iii) The Appellant is required to be registered in terms of the provisions of Section 22(1) of the CGST Act, 2017.