| Sr. No. | Name of the Applicant | States/UT | Brief of Order in Appeal (OIA) | Order No. & Date | Download | Category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 291 | M/s RAJASTHAN TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED | Rajasthan | Q1. Whether Goods and Service tax was required to be paid on the charges paid to the Railways on behalf of Operator and those charges were recovered from the Operator? Ans- Yes, GST was required to be paid by the Applicant on the charges paid to the Indian Railways for operation of POWas discussed earlier in point no. F-7. Q2. Why not the said charges were come under the scope of the pure agent? Ans- The said charges are not covered under the scope Pure Agent in view of the discussion held in point no. F-8 to F-12 mentioned above. Q3. If charges paid to the Railways on behalf of Operator do not come under the scope of the pure agent or liable to be tax, then what will be the tax Rate? Ans- Yes, the charges are paid to the Indian Railways by the Applicant and not operator and therefore are leviable to GST as per the rate mentioned in point no. F-15. |
RAJ/AAR/2024-25/11 Dated 28.06.2024 | 97(2) (d) | |
| 292 | M/s Mannarai Common Effluent Treatment Plant Private Limited | Tamil Nadu | 1. Whether the classification of supply of outputs as sale of goods is correct? 2, Whether the classification of water sold as ‘water including natural or artificial mineral waters and aerated waters, not containing added Sugar or sweetening matter, not flavoured (other than drinking water packed in 20 litre bottles) under heading 2201 is correct? |
TN/20/AAR/2023 (Remanded}, Dated 27.06.2024 | 97(2)(a),(b) | |
| 293 | M/s DECCAN CEMENTS LIMITED, | Rajasthan | Whether the applicant is liable to pay any GST on the Royalty payment of Mining Lease to Government of Rajasthan under RCM |
RAJ/AAR/2024-25/08 Dated 26.06.2024 | 97(2) (b) (c) (d) ( e ) & (f) | |
| 294 | M/s DINDAYAL COLLOIDS PRIVATE LIMITED, | Rajasthan | The Classification and applicable rate of GST and/ or Compensation Cess on product ‘Tobacco pre-mixed with lime. |
RAJ/AAR/2024-25/09 Dated 26.06.2024 | 97 (2) (a) | |
| 295 | M/s Metropolitan Transport Corporation | Tamil Nadu | 1) Is collection of increased rents for the past period considered as the term “supply” under Goods and Service Tax? (I) If the answer to the first question is yes, {a} is the entire increased amount of Rs, 1,60,42,203 subject to GST? OR {b) is only the portion of the invoice value of Rs.99,19,432 relating to after July 1, 2017, liable for GST and the rest Rs.61,22,771 were exempt as it related to service tax period? |
TN/12/AAR/2024, Dated 25.06.2024 | 97(2)(e)(g) | |
| 296 | M/s. CONCEPT COLOUR TECNIKS PRIVATE LIMITED | Karnataka | a. CGST and SGST rates as on powder coating for customers materials-use of phosphating chemicals and epoxy-polyester powder for aesthetic purpose. b. CGST and SGST rate as on phosphating for customers materials- use of phosphating chemicals for corrosion prevention The application filed by the Applicant for Advance Ruling disposed off as withdrawn. |
KAR ADRG 18/2024 Dated 25.06.2024 | - | |
| 297 | NALINA SONNEGOWDA (M/s. Lekhana Builders) | Karnataka | The application filed by the Applicant for Advance Ruling disposed off as withdrawn. |
KAR ADRG 16/2024 Dated 25.06.2024 | - | |
| 298 | M/s. KMS COACH BUILDER PRIVATE LIMITED | Karnataka | The application filed by the Applicant for Advance Ruling disposed off as withdrawn. |
KAR ADRG 17/2024 Dated 25.06.2024 | - | |
| 299 | M/s. FORTUNE AGRO INPEX | Karnataka | The application filed by the Applicant for Advance Ruling disposed off as withdrawn. |
KAR ADRG 19/2024 Dated 25.06.2024 | - | |
| 300 | M/s. T S TRANSPORT | Karnataka | The application filed by the Applicant for Advance Ruling rejected in terms of Section 98(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 |
KAR ADRG 24/2024 Dated 25.06.2024 | - |









